Sivga Que vs. Que UTG Comparison Review

Sivga has built a reputation for crafting stylish, great-sounding IEMs at accessible prices, and the Sivga Que UTG is their latest offering under $100. As a follow-up to the original Sivga Que, the UTG introduces several upgrades that raise an important question: How do these two compare in design, features, and sound? Whether you're looking for your first IEM or a budget-friendly upgrade, this comparison will help you decide which model best suits your needs.

What’s in the Box?

Both models come well-equipped with thoughtful accessories, though the Que UTG adds a significant upgrade in versatility.

 

While the standard Sivga Que keeps things simple with a fixed 3.5mm cable, the Que UTG includes interchangeable terminations, offering both 3.5mm single-ended and 4.4mm balanced connections. This flexibility makes the UTG a more future-proof and adaptable choice for users with multiple devices or balanced outputs.

Aesthetics and Build Quality

Visually, both IEMs reflect Sivga's commitment to high-quality materials and eye-catching design, but the UTG pushes things further in both refinement and ergonomics.

The Sivga Que pairs maple wood faceplates with zinc alloy housings, achieving a lightweight yet premium look. Despite the modest price, the build feels solid and durable, with a comfort-focused fit that stays secure even during extended listening sessions. The cable is lightweight, comfortable over the ear, and equipped with standard 2-pin connectors.

In contrast, the Que UTG introduces green sandalwood shells that contrast elegantly with a silver-plated OFC cable. The darker aesthetic of the UTG feels more mature and polished. Its ergonomic contouring offers improved seal and comfort, making it better suited for longer critical listening sessions. The ability to easily switch between terminations makes it more versatile for both mobile and desktop setups.

Technical Specifications

Based on these specifications, you'll see that there are a few notable differences between the two earphones. The original Sivga Que has a beryllium driver while the Queen UTG goes for a glass diaphragm. This difference in material makeup will change the sound profile slightly, and you can even see that in the sensitivity of the earphones. Their frequency response and magnet circuit system remains the same, so the ultimate test to see the difference will be by listening to some tracks on both. 

Listening Review

Soundstage and Imaging

The original Sivga Que surprises with a spacious soundstage for its price point. Sounds are spread with decent width and height, delivering a fun and immersive experience. Though imaging isn’t hyper-precise, it conveys enough spatial depth to make tracks feel alive, especially in cinematic or bass-heavy music.

The Que UTG improves on this with greater depth, precision, and instrument separation. Imaging is tighter, creating a more three-dimensional space where vocals and instruments are well-defined. Forward projection is enhanced, giving acoustic instruments and layered samples more clarity and presence. This elevates the UTG into a more analytical and reference-friendly territory without sacrificing engagement.

Bass Response

Bass lovers will appreciate the Sivga Que’s low-end character. Thanks to the beryllium diaphragm, it produces punchy kicks and full-bodied bass lines with notable extension into the sub-bass. Whether you're listening to rock, hip-hop, or EDM, the Que delivers thump and warmth without losing composure.

The Que UTG refines this formula. Its glass diaphragm produces tighter and more controlled bass that hits just as deep, but with improved agility and detail. The sub-bass rolls in with power but avoids bloat, making it a great match for electronic genres and cinematic scores. Fast transients ensure that each bass note feels impactful but never muddy.

Midrange Performance

The Que’s midrange is colorful and expressive. Vocals take center stage, especially in the upper mids, where they shine with texture and clarity. Tracks like Megan Moroney’s “Bless Your Heart” highlight how well the Que handles layered instrumentation, letting vocals rise through a rich acoustic backdrop.

The Que UTG offers even greater detail retrieval and balance. Midrange instruments feel more lifelike, with natural timbre and separation. There’s warmth without veiling, and the upper mids carry a pleasing sparkle that enhances strings and female vocals. Its neutral tuning ensures the mids never feel overshadowed by the lows or highs, making it more suitable for classical, folk, and acoustic music lovers.

Treble Detail

Treble is another area where both models perform well, though they take different approaches. The Sivga Que offers a clear, airy top end that complements the low-end warmth. There’s enough sparkle to reveal harmonic details in synths, reverbs, and high-pitched percussive elements, though it lacks some of the refinement found in more expensive IEMs.

The Que UTG, on the other hand, delivers crisp, articulate highs with improved resolution. Thanks to the glass diaphragm, treble frequencies have more shimmer and finesse, enhancing cymbals and strings without introducing harshness. The UTG manages to strike a rare balance: it’s detailed enough for analytical listening yet smooth enough to avoid fatigue.

Final Thoughts: Which Sivga Que Is Right for You?

Both the Sivga Que and Que UTG offer excellent value, but they cater to slightly different listeners. The Sivga Que is perfect for those who want a warm, musical tuning with a simple plug-and-play setup. Its strong low-end and vocal-forward signature make it a joy for pop, rock, and everyday casual listening.

Meanwhile, the Que UTG steps things up with a more refined design, a cleaner, more balanced sound signature, and interchangeable terminations for added versatility. It's a better choice for listeners seeking more detail, tighter bass control, and compatibility with balanced sources.

Ultimately, your ears will be the best judge. If possible, audition both side-by-side to see which tuning best suits your sonic taste.

You can find both models available at Audio46.

Quick Comparison Chart

---