The Audeze LCD-S20 vs Beyerdynamic DT 1770 MKII Comparison

by Delaney Czernikowski

Bookmark this article Copy to clipboard Email to a Friend

LCD-S20 vs. DT 1770 MKII

Every new recording artist can remember their first pair of studio headphones. Be it the Audio-Technica M20x or the AKG K240, these headphones are standard for beginner reference sound. Now, what happens when your ear outgrows those basic signatures? There are a few companies that have your back for upgrading your gear as your ear improves. 

Audeze and Beyerdynamic have made numerous pairs of entry-level and audiophile-grade headphones, but today we're going to be taking a look at two that sit squarely in the midrange. The new LCD-S20 from Audeze and the upgraded DT 1770 MKII from Beyerdynamic are two headphones that serve as excellent upgrades to any beginner's setup. But which one is right for you? This review dives deep into all the details so you can make an informed decision on how to upgrade your studio sessions. 

WHAT COMES IN THE BOX

AUDEZE LCD-S20

  • LCD-S20 headphone
  • 2.5m (8.2ft) headphone cable
  • 3.5mm to 6.3mm adaptor
  • Audeze Warranty Card


BEYERDYNAMIC DT 1770 PRO MKII

  • DT 1170 PRO MKII Headphones
  • Velour ear pads
  • Leatherette ear pads
  • 3.5mm to 6.35mm (1/4") lockable stereo jack plug
  • 3-pin XLR plug to 3.5mm 3m straight cable
  • 3-pin XLR plug to 3.5mm 5m coiled cable
  • High-quality hard case
  • Beyerdynamic Warranty

DESIGN & BUILD QUALITY

Looking at the two headphones side by side, you can see the aesthetic differences and similarities. Both have round earcups that cover your ears completely, providing decent sound isolation. They both have single-ended cables, though only the Audeze allows you to choose which side the cable will rest on. The DT 1770 MKII is also a detachable cable, though there is only one port for it to go in. The headbands are adjustable with different mechanisms. The DT 1770 MKII is a sliding adjustment, while the Audeze LCD-S20 gives you three notches to move the headband on. It is less exact than the Beyerdynamic headphone, but more secure in its adjustment.

Wearing these two headphones gave quite a different experience. The DT 1770 MKII is far lighter than the LCD-S20, so I was immediately drawn to that element of it. The LCD-S20 was very heavy on the head, and the loose clamping force didn't give me security that it would stay on my head if I moved around a bit. The DT 1770 MKII was the opposite, with a tight clamping force that was lightweight and secure on my head. You could argue that it was too tight to be taken on and off comfortably, but if I were to use these in a studio environment, I would want to have it stay on my head for easy use while recording. 

Ultimately, I preferred the build quality of the Beyerdynamic over the Audeze. Aesthetically, both are stunning and have great build quality, but the DT 1770 MKII makes up for the stable comfort that the LCD-S20 lacks. 

PHOTO GALLERY

AUDEZE LCD-S20

BEYERDYNAMIC DT 1770 PRO MKII

LCD-S20
DT 1770 MKII
LCD-S20 side profile
DT 1770 PRO MKII side profile
LCD-S20 cable connection point
DT 1770 PRO MKII on table

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

AUDEZE LCD-S20

  • Style: Over-ear, closed-back
  • Transducer Type: Planar magnetic
  • Magnetic structure: Fluxor™ magnet array
  • Magnet Type: Neodymium N50
  • Phase Management: Fazor™
  • Acoustic Management: SLAM™
  • Diaphragm Type: Ultra-Thin Uniforce™
  •  Transducer Size: 90mm
  • Maximum SPL: >120dB
  • THD: <0.1% @ 100dB SPL, 1kHz
  • Impedance: 18 ohms
  • Sensitivity: 93dB/1mW (@ Drum Reference Point)
  • Maximum Power Handling: 5W RMS
  • Minimum Power Requirement: >100mW
  • Recommended Power Level: >250mW
  • Weight: 550g

BEYERDYNAMIC DT 1770 PRO MKII

  • Wearing Style: Over-ear
  • Operating Principle: Closed
  • Transmission Type: Wired
  • Remote: Without Remote
  • Nominal Impedance (Headphones): 30 ohms
  • Weight (Headphones without cable): 377 g
  • Headphone Frequency Response: 5-40,000 Hz
  • Nominal Sound Pressure Level: 95 dBSPL (1mW/500Hz)
  • Sound Coupling to the Ear: Circumaural (around the ear)
  • Cable & Plug:
    • 3-pin XLR plug
    • 6.35 mm (1/4") stereo jack plug
    • 3 m straight cable & 5 m coiled cable

LISTENING REVIEW

SOUNDSTAGE & IMAGING

Closed-back headphones tend to have a narrower soundstage because they get cut off at the ends, but these two headphones present equally wide stereo images. The width presented truly wraps around you, more in the Audeze LCD-S20 than the Beyerdynamic DT 1770 MKII. The Audeze has a very wide soundstage that is flatter than anything. This headphone was advertised as a mixing headphone, and that's exactly what I think of when I use this headphone. There is very little height or depth to show any personality, and while that may make a headphone boring, it instead makes it a great tool for professional use. 

On the other hand, Beyerdynamic has been well-regarded in the audio industry for years, and the DT 770 MKII adds onto that legacy. It has a soundstage that is equally as wide but with more coloration. There are subtle dynamic notes to the top and bottom end, giving you a bit of flair for entertaining listening as much as studio work. There is decent height to the frequencies at the top end, and there is noticeable depth for instrument separation. Imaging accuracy is a strong suit and is comparable to what you would find on the LCD-S20. 

These two headphones offer similar sound signatures, but there are enough distinct qualities in each for you to tell the difference. The LCD-S20 focuses on image placement and tonal accuracy, and leaves nothing up to imagination. The DT 1770 MKII leans into a more fun experience with natural sound reproduction and more dynamics between the highs and lows. 

BASS FREQUENCIES

As we go into the specific frequency ranges, we can pick apart what really sets the LCD-S20 and the DT 1770 MKII apart. To be blunt, Audeze LCD-S20 has no bass. It is severely lacking, so much so that you think there's nothing there at all. However, upon closer inspection, you notice that the S20 bass is there, just very delicately placed behind midrange and treble coloration. People who need to hear some sub-bass rumble will definitely be disappointed by the response from this headphone. On the flip side, you get amazing color and texture from the bass that opens up the possibility of more unique bass tones. You won't miss the twang of a bass or the note of a kick drum, so you can expertly place them into your mix without issue. 

The DT 1770 MKII also doesn't have a lot of bass, but it still has more than the LCD-S20. It is more controlled and punchier, with a thicker body that actually takes up space in a track. You get more drive in this bass and get to feel the beat of a song as well as hear it. The lower register instruments hit harder and have more body to them than you get in the LCD-S20. It doesn't overpower the whole signature, and it isn't super powerful to become overwhelming, but it has just enough presence to be effective and deliver a punch when it needs to. This is good for people who tend to mix bass-heavy: you will be forced to tune it back based on the low register already coming off strongly. 

MIDRANGE FREQUENCIES

Midrange clarity is something both these headphones do well. The Audeze LCD-S20 is exceptionally good at uncovering hidden details that may get lost in other recordings, because the sound is so frontal and ready to be picked apart from the minute you press play. I was impressed by the vocal clarity and how natural everything was, sounding like it was in the room with me and not just being reproduced through headphones. The timbres of instruments were easy ot pick apart as well, and with the imaging accuracy, the LCD-S20 becomes a front-runner for reference sound. 

Similarly, the Beyerdynamic DT 1770 MKII delivers the same stunning precision in the midrange placement. There is excellent sound reproduction to keep instrument timbres honest and natural, so using these headphones in a studio environment makes perfect sense. While there is a good amount of detail in the midrange, it lessens when you put it directly against the LCD-S20. The frequencies don't separate as cleanly as some others, but you still get distinct coloration that helps you in your audio editing. 

TREBLE FREQUENCIES

The treble range is the most noticeable thing in both of these headphones. The LCD-S20 doesn't shy away from a strong treble response, as it helps the detail and space come into this headphone. The top end of the LCD-S20 holds a lot of air and space for frequencies to dissipate naturally, most heard in some orchestral recordings. Some frequencies bordered on too sharp, and without the bass to balance it out, these areas were a little fatiguing at times. Still, the level of detail this range provides cannot be dismissed, as it gives all the qualities a reference headphone should. 

The DT 1770 MKII handles treble frequencies in a more laid-back fashion. While the space and detail are still there, you get less forward presence from the treble frequencies. They line up more with the bass frequencies, filtering just behind the midrange, so you get most of the instrumental detail first with treble highlights. When you look at this side-by-side with the LCD-S20, you may think the DT 1770 MKII is lacking. The treble performance may not be as strong, but it still accentuates the detail in a subtle way without ever getting into "piercing" or "sharp" territory.

FINAL THOUGHTS: LCD-S20 OR DT 1770 MKII?

After all the analysis is said and done, which one is the best suited for your needs? Is one headphone better than the other? The LCD-S20 and the DT 1770 MKII cater to the same audience, but they deliver different results. The LCD-S20 gives an exceptional treble performance with pinpoint imaging accuracy, though it misses the mark on the bass. The DT 1770 MKII puts comfort first and produces an excellent bass response, but loses some clarity in trade for more coloration and dynamic listening. 

You'll find that based on your listening and producing style, you'll get an answer for which headphone is right for you. If you are someone who needs detail above all else, the Audeze LCD-S20 should be your go-to. If you prioritize coloration and want a headphone that can double for more than just a working instrument, then the Beyerdynamic DT 1770 MKII is the one to put on your radar. 

With $200 between them, you are sure to find your upgrade with the LCD-S20 or the DT 1770 MKII. 

You can get the Audeze LCD-S20 and the Beyerdynamic DT 1770 MKII at Audio46. 

QUICK SUMMARY

Both are excellent mixing headphones, known for their natural sound reproduction and flat signatures. 

The LCD-S20 is loose on the head and heavier; the DT 1770 MKII is lightweight with a tight clamping force.

The DT 1770 MKII has a stronger bass response, while the LCD-S20 keeps it very subtle. 

There are more exact details from the clarity in the LCD-S20 than from the dynamics of the DT 1770 MKII. 

Audeze LCD-S20: $499 // Beyerdynamic DT 1770 MKII: $699

OTHER COMPARISON REVIEWS

Get the Latest Headphone News and Reviews in Your Inbox


Subscribe to our newsletter and get 10% off your first purchase!*

*some restrictions may apply